Question Description
This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.
Locate no more than 10 research articles related to your EBP project.( We are only doing 3 articles as part on this and is copied below)
Reddy, A., Yennurajalingam, S., & Bruera, E. (n.d). “Whatever my mother wants”: Barriers to adequate pain management. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 16(6), 709-712. doi:10.1089/jpm.2012.0189
Reynolds, J., Drew, D., & Dunwoody, C. (2013). American society for pain management nursing position statement: Pain management at the end of life. Pain Management Nursing, (3), 172. doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2013.07.002
Sanders, S., Herr, K. A., Fine, P. G., Fiala, C., Tang, X., & Forcucci, C. (2013). An examination of adherence to pain medication plans in older cancer patients in hospice care. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, (1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.01.007
Use the assigned Topic Materials “CLC: EBP Research Table”(ATTACHED). and “CLC Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Project Student Guide.” (ATTACHED).
You will use the “CLC: EBP Research Table” to consolidate and present the findings. Pay attention to the prompts for each column.
This assignment uses a rubric (ATTACHED). Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment
CLC – EBP Literature Search/Appraisal of Evidence
| 1 Not submitted 0.00% | 2 Unsatisfactory 75.00% | 3 Less Than Satisfactory 80.00% | 4 Satisfactory 88.00% | 5 Good 92.00% | 6 Excellent 100.00% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70.0 %Content | ||||||
| 35.0 %Appraisal of Literature | None | Review of literature is minimal and not all relevant. Table displaying information are missing or missing most required information. Appraisal of evidence is inaccurate. Conclusions are not justified. | Review of literature is inadequate. Table displaying articles has minimal information making it difficult for the reader to evaluate the appraisal of evidence. Conclusions drawn are questionable. | Adequate review of literature. Table displaying articles reviewed has adequate detail to evaluate information and portray a mostly accurate appraisal of the value of the evidence. Conclusions drawn not fully justified. | Adequate review of literature. Table displaying articles reviewed has adequate detail to evaluate information and portray an accurate appraisal of the value of the evidence. Conclusions drawn are justifiable. | Thorough review of literature. Table displaying articles reviewed has adequate detail to evaluate information and portray an accurate appraisal of the value of the evidence. Conclusions drawn are justifiable. |
| 35.0 %Synthesis of Findings | None | Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. | Synthesis of literature does not provide an adequate justification for changing practice. | Synthesis of reviewed literature is clear and mostly accurate. | Synthesis of reviewed literature is clear, well integrated, and accurate. | Synthesis of reviewed literature is clear, well integrated, accurate and reported in precise research language. |
| 5.0 %Organization and Effectiveness |
